Rankings

1Ohio State▲4

How this rank was computed

Elo

1771.87+70.0 over the last three

Last three

W 17 IOWAW 29 MDW 4 IU

AP

#3 → 9.77 curved over the 138-team field

Editor

#1 → 10.00 this week's editor list

Composite

result 9.4 + editor 10.0 → 9.7

Weights

editorial 0.70 · AP 0.30

Dimensions

result, of 5 momentum is shown, not blended; process, squad and coherence are held

2Miami–

How this rank was computed

Elo

1777.34+45.4 over the last three

Last three

W 49 CMUW 28 CLEMW 8 FSU

AP

#1 → 10.00 curved over the 138-team field

Editor

#2 → 9.88 this week's editor list

Composite

result 9.5 + editor 9.9 → 9.7

Weights

editorial 0.70 · AP 0.30

Dimensions

result, of 5 momentum is shown, not blended; process, squad and coherence are held

3BYU▲5

How this rank was computed

Elo

1726.30+50.4 over the last three

Last three

W 7 TCUW 14 ISUW 4 ND

AP

#2 → 9.88 curved over the 138-team field

Editor

#3 → 9.77 this week's editor list

Composite

result 8.7 + editor 9.8 → 9.2

Weights

editorial 0.70 · AP 0.30

Dimensions

result, of 5 momentum is shown, not blended; process, squad and coherence are held

4Indiana–

How this rank was computed

Elo

1745.10-3.4 over the last three

Last three

W 32 RUTGW 3 NEBL 4 OSU

AP

#6 → 9.43 curved over the 138-team field

Editor

#4 → 9.66 this week's editor list

Composite

result 9.0 + editor 9.7 → 9.3

Weights

editorial 0.70 · AP 0.30

Dimensions

result, of 5 momentum is shown, not blended; process, squad and coherence are held

5Georgia▼4

How this rank was computed

Elo

1734.10+2.9 over the last three

Last three

W 24 VANW 3 ALAL 3 AUB

AP

#5 → 9.54 curved over the 138-team field

Editor

#5 → 9.54 this week's editor list

Composite

result 8.8 + editor 9.5 → 9.2

Weights

editorial 0.70 · AP 0.30

Dimensions

result, of 5 momentum is shown, not blended; process, squad and coherence are held

The model's case: James Madison · #26 · 8.80